Impact-Site-Verification: 0eedbe8d-4e05-4893-8456-85377301e322

Stock · Trading days

Figma (FIG)

Figma's returns, drawdowns, and beta to S&P 500, in one view.

Gale Finance Team
Written by Gale Finance Team
Sid Kalla
Reviewed by Sid Kalla CFA Charterholder
Quick Answer

What is Figma's risk, return, and volatility like?

Figma does not yet have enough history for Gale's standard long window, so the page keeps headline metrics on a single since-inception lens. Since inception return is -83.3%, since inception volatility is 85.7%, and current drawdown is -84.2%.

Total Return
Since inception -83.3%
Sharpe Ratio
Since inception -2.28
Annualized Volatility
Since inception 85.7%
Max Drawdown
Since inception -86.2%

Trade FIG

Access this asset on trusted platforms.

Affiliate disclosure

Price history

Figma price since inception

Track Figma's standalone price path with macro and asset-specific events enabled by default.

Figma price since inception

FIG
Latest close $19.33 Data through 2026-05-12
Since inception low $16.86 Window low
Since inception high $122.00 Window high

Key takeaways

  • Total Return: FIG returned -83.3% over the Since inception window ; annualized return was -89.9%.
  • Risk-adjusted return: Sharpe was -2.28 and Sortino was -2.85 over Since inception. Sharpe counts total volatility; Sortino focuses on downside volatility.
  • Volatility & drawdown: Annualized volatility was 85.7% over Since inception ; max drawdown was -86.2% over Since inception .
  • Tail risk (Expected Shortfall): Over Since inception, daily VaR (5%) was -9.4% and Expected Shortfall was -14.2%. VaR is the cutoff; Expected Shortfall is the average move inside the worst 5% of daily returns.
  • Skew & kurtosis: Over Since inception, skew was -0.94 and excess kurtosis was 5.24. Skew shows return asymmetry; excess kurtosis shows how fat the tails were versus a Normal distribution.
  • Risk ratios: Sortino Ratio: -2.85 , Calmar Ratio: -1.04 , Sterling Ratio: -1.09 , Treynor Ratio: -1.22 , Ulcer Index: 68.36% .

Figma Drawdown

FIG Since inception Max Drawdown
-86.2%
2025-08-01 to 2026-04-29

Max drawdown shows the deepest peak-to-trough decline Figma suffered in each research window. Since inception: -86.2%.

Figma is currently -84.2% below its prior peak, with the high-water mark at $122.00. Since inception low is $16.86.

FIG underwater plot (Since inception). Zero means at a prior peak; dips show how far below peak the close was on each day. Deepest trough: -86.2% on Apr 29, 2026.
-86.2% 2025-07-31 2026-05-12 0% -86%

Since inception drawdown episodes

#1
-86.2% Aug 1, 2025 to Apr 29, 2026
Not yet recovered 284 total days

Figma Volatility

FIG Since inception Volatility
85.7%
Annualized daily closes

Volatility Figma's annualized volatility shows how widely daily closes moved over Since inception. Higher values mean a noisier path, not automatically a better or worse investment. Since inception: 85.7%.

Benchmark context

Where FIG fits relative to other lenses

Benchmark links are secondary on this page. Use them when you want to place the asset against a specific market, factor, or historical counterpart.

Default benchmark

S&P 500

SPY

Broad equity benchmark

Since inception return
+17.5%
FIG minus SPY
-100.7%
Correlation
0.37
Since inception
FIG vs SPY average correlation
Moderately linked
0.37
QQQ

Nasdaq 100

Corr 0.37

Growth and tech benchmark

Since inception return +25.5%
FIG minus QQQ -108.7%
BTC

Bitcoin

Corr 0.22

Cross-asset crypto benchmark

Since inception return -29.8%
FIG minus BTC -53.5%
XAU

Gold

Corr 0.04

Store-of-value benchmark

Since inception return +43.3%
FIG minus XAU -126.6%

Risk-adjusted ratios

These ratios compare return against different definitions of risk: total volatility, downside volatility, drawdowns, benchmark beta, and time spent underwater.

Figma Sharpe Ratio

FIG Since inception Sharpe ratio
-2.28
Available history

FIG Sharpe Ratio (Since inception)

Return per total volatility

The dot sits at (Figma's annualized volatility, its excess annualized return). The slope from the origin to the dot is the Sharpe ratio — steeper means the asset converted risk into return more efficiently.

Higher is better
Excess return Annualized volatility 0 100% vol 85.7% · excess -195.0%
excess annualized return / total volatility
Formula Sharpe=E[R]RfσR\displaystyle \mathrm{Sharpe} = \frac{\mathbb{E}[R] - R_f}{\sigma_R}

Sharpe ratio Figma's Sharpe ratio measures excess return per unit of total volatility. Higher readings mean the asset converted risk into return more efficiently over the same window. Since inception: -2.28.

A Sharpe above 1.0 is generally considered good, above 2.0 is excellent. Negative Sharpe means the asset underperformed the risk-free rate. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Figma Sortino Ratio

FIG Since inception Sortino ratio
-2.85
Available history

FIG Sortino Ratio (Since inception)

Return per downside volatility

Figma's daily-return distribution over the long window. Days left of the target line are the only ones Sortino penalizes in the denominator — so a distribution with a fat left tail produces a smaller Sortino even at the same mean return.

Higher is better
Frequency (days) Daily return (%) target -29.1% +18.6% 28 0
excess annualized return / downside volatility
Formula Sortino=E[R]Rfσdown\displaystyle \mathrm{Sortino} = \frac{\mathbb{E}[R] - R_f}{\sigma_{\mathrm{down}}}

Sortino ratio Figma's Sortino ratio isolates downside volatility instead of all volatility. It is the cleaner lens when you care more about bad downside moves than upside noise. Since inception: -2.85.

A higher Sortino is better. It's useful when upside volatility is common (crypto is the obvious example). Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices, using the daily risk-free rate as the target return, and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Figma Calmar Ratio

FIG Since inception Calmar ratio
-1.04
Available history

FIG Calmar Ratio (Since inception)

CAGR per worst drawdown

Figma's CAGR bar sits above zero, the max drawdown bar sits below. Calmar is the ratio of those two magnitudes — a shallow drawdown bar with a tall CAGR bar produces a strong Calmar.

Higher is better
0% FIG Since inception -89.9% -86.2%
CAGR / max drawdown
Formula Calmar=CAGRMaxDD\displaystyle \mathrm{Calmar} = \frac{\mathrm{CAGR}}{|\mathrm{MaxDD}|}

Calmar ratio Figma's Calmar ratio measures return per unit of max drawdown. It is useful when the path of losses matters as much as the final return. Since inception: -1.04.

Calmar is computed on each asset's full 365-day lookback and uses the max drawdown over that same window.

Figma Sterling Ratio

FIG Since inception Sterling ratio
-1.09
Available history

FIG Sterling Ratio (Since inception)

Return per average drawdown

The underwater curve shows Figma's drawdowns over the long window. Sterling averages every event deeper than the 10% threshold instead of taking only the worst one — so an asset with many mid-size drawdowns scores worse here than on Calmar.

Higher is better
0% -23% -45% -68% -90% 10% drawdown threshold
excess CAGR / average deep drawdown
Formula Sterling=CAGRRfD>10%\displaystyle \mathrm{Sterling} = \frac{\mathrm{CAGR} - R_f}{\overline{D}_{>10\%}}

Sterling ratio Figma's Sterling ratio compares return against deep drawdown pressure. It gives a harsher read on assets that compound well but suffer ugly declines along the way. Since inception: -1.09.

Sterling uses average drawdown events deeper than 10% and subtracts the risk-free rate to report excess return.

Figma Ulcer Index

FIG Since inception Ulcer Index
68.36
Available history

FIG Ulcer Index (Since inception)

Drawdown pain

The underwater curve shows how deep and how long Figma's drawdowns were. Ulcer is the root-mean-square of that curve — both depth and persistence count, so lower is better.

Lower is better
0% -23% -45% -68% -90%
root-mean-square drawdown
Formula UI=E[Dt2]\displaystyle \mathrm{UI} = \sqrt{\mathbb{E}[D_t^2]}

Ulcer Index Figma's Ulcer Index measures both the depth and persistence of drawdowns. Lower is better because it means fewer and shallower underwater periods. Since inception: 68.36.

Ulcer Index is computed from each asset's drawdown series over the full lookback window.

Figma Treynor Ratio

FIG Since inception Treynor
-1.22
Beta 1.60 vs SPY
FIG Since inception Treynor
-1.22
Beta 1.60 vs SPY

FIG Treynor Ratio (Since inception)

Excess return per beta vs SPY

The line's slope is Figma's beta to SPY — steeper means more market-sensitive. Treynor divides excess return by that slope, so an asset can look efficient with a shallow beta and a small return, or inefficient with a steep beta and a big return.

Higher is better
Asset return Market return 0 0 β 1.60
excess return / market beta
Formula Treynor=E[R]Rfβ\displaystyle \mathrm{Treynor} = \frac{\mathbb{E}[R] - R_f}{\beta}

Treynor ratio measures excess return per unit of market beta versus SPY. A high Treynor means the asset compensated its market exposure well over this window. A low or negative Treynor means the asset's market risk wasn't rewarded.

Treynor uses beta vs the S&P 500 (SPY) on shared dates and the average 3-month Treasury rate as the risk-free rate.

Figma Tail Risk

Tail-risk stats use daily return distributions rather than simple end-point returns. They show how ugly the left tail has been, how severe the worst 5% of days were, and whether returns were skewed toward outsized upside or downside shocks.

The histogram shows the shape of Figma's daily log returns over the Since inception window. Bars left of the 5% VaR marker are the worst 5% of days; the ES marker is the average loss inside that tail. Skew and excess kurtosis describe whether the distribution is symmetric around zero and whether extreme days are more common than a Normal distribution predicts.

FIG daily return distribution (Since inception)

FIG daily return distribution (Since inception)

Log-return histogram with Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall markers at the 5% left tail.

Days
FIG Since inception VaR 5% ES 5% -36.6% 0% +36.6% Daily log return
worst-5% daily return and the average loss inside it
Formula VaR5%=Q0.05(R),ES5%=E[RRVaR5%]\displaystyle \mathrm{VaR}_{5\%} = Q_{0.05}(R),\quad \mathrm{ES}_{5\%} = \mathbb{E}[R \mid R \le \mathrm{VaR}_{5\%}]
Metric Since inception
VaR (5%) -9.4% Historical daily threshold
Expected shortfall (5%) -14.2% Beyond the VaR threshold
Skew -0.94
Excess kurtosis 5.24

Less negative daily VaR and Expected Shortfall values mean the left tail was less violent. Skew and excess kurtosis help distinguish between steady compounding and a path dominated by occasional extreme moves.

Full stats table

Every window-consistent research metric

Each column keeps the same horizon across returns, ratios, drawdowns, and tail-risk metrics.

Metric
Since inception Available history
Total return
-83.3%
Annualized return
-89.9%
Volatility
85.7% Annualized daily closes
Sharpe ratio
-2.28
Sortino ratio
-2.85
Calmar ratio
-1.04
Sterling ratio
-1.09
Ulcer Index
68.36
Max drawdown
-86.2% 2025-08-01 to 2026-04-29
VaR (5%)
-9.4% Historical daily threshold
Expected shortfall (5%)
-14.2% Beyond the VaR threshold
Skew
-0.94
Excess kurtosis
5.24

What viewers usually ask next

What is Figma's Since inception return?

Figma's since inception return is -83.3% on Gale using the since-inception window.

What is Figma's since-inception volatility?

Annualized volatility is 85.7% over the since-inception window.

What is Figma's since-inception Sharpe ratio?

Figma's Sharpe ratio is -2.28 using the since-inception window.

What is Figma's since-inception Sortino ratio?

Figma's Sortino ratio is -2.85 using the since-inception window.

What is Figma's since-inception Calmar ratio?

Figma's Calmar ratio is -1.04 using the since-inception window.

What is Figma's since-inception Sterling ratio?

Figma's Sterling ratio is -1.09 using the since-inception window.

What is Figma's since-inception Ulcer Index?

Figma's Ulcer Index is 68.36 using the since-inception window. Lower is better because it means shallower and less persistent drawdowns.

What is Figma's since-inception max drawdown?

Max drawdown is -86.2% over the since-inception window from 2025-08-01 to 2026-04-29.

What is Figma's since-inception daily Value at Risk?

Using historical daily returns, Gale estimates a 5% Value at Risk of -9.35% over the since-inception window.

What is Figma's since-inception Expected Shortfall?

Expected Shortfall is -14.20% over the since-inception window, which captures the average outcome inside the worst 5% of daily returns.

Is Figma still below its all-time high?

Current drawdown is -84.2% versus the all-time high of $122.00 reached on 2025-08-01.

Which benchmark should viewers open first for Figma?

S&P 500 is the default benchmark lens on Gale because it gives the cleanest context for Figma's recent behavior.