AVGO vs AMD: Stock Returns, Risk & Volatility (2026)

Q: Which is a better investment: AVGO or AMD?

Over the past year, AMD looks like the better investment: it had higher total return (AMD +86.9% vs AVGO +50.3%) and a higher Sharpe ratio (AMD 1.19 vs AVGO 0.99). On risk, AVGO was less volatile (AVGO 51.1% vs AMD 64.0%), AMD had a smaller max drawdown (AMD -31.9% vs AVGO -35.8%), and AVGO had less severe losses on the worst 5% of days (Expected Shortfall of AVGO -6.84% vs AMD -8.43%).

Written by Gale Finance Team

Reviewed by Sid Kalla CFA Charterholder

Quick answer

Which is a better investment: AVGO or AMD?

Over the past year, AMD outperformed (+50.3% vs +86.9%) with a Sharpe ratio of 1.19.

Total Return

AVGO +50.3%

AMD WIN +86.9%

Sharpe Ratio

AVGO 0.99

AMD WIN 1.19

Annualized Volatility

AVGO WIN 51.1%

AMD 64.0%

Max Drawdown

AVGO -35.8%

AMD WIN -31.9%

Analysis period: 2025-02-18 to 2026-02-13

AVGO Total Return

↑ +50.3%

AMD Total Return

↑ +86.9%

Relative Performance of AVGO vs AMD (Normalized to 100)

AVGO AMD

Normalized to 100 at start date for comparison

Key Takeaways

Total Return: AVGO delivered a +50.3% total return, while AMD returned +86.9% over the same period. AMD outperformed on total returns.
Risk-Adjusted Return (Sharpe Ratio): AMD had a higher Sharpe (1.19 vs 0.99), indicating better risk-adjusted performance.
Volatility (Annualized): AMD was more volatile, with 64.0% annualized volatility, versus 51.1% for AVGO.
Maximum Drawdown: AMD's maximum drawdown was -31.9%, while AVGO experienced a deeper drawdown of -35.8%.
Tail Risk (VaR & Expected Shortfall): At the 5% level (daily log returns), AVGO's VaR was -5.03% and its Expected Shortfall (CVaR) was -6.84%; AMD's were -5.60% and -8.43%. VaR is the cutoff; Expected Shortfall is the average move on the worst days.
Skew & Kurtosis: Skew: AVGO 0.43 vs AMD 0.70. Excess kurtosis: AVGO 4.61 vs AMD 7.67. Negative skew leans downside; higher excess kurtosis means fatter tails.
Tail Days & Extremes: 2σ tail days (down/up): AVGO 6/7, AMD 6/6. Worst day: AVGO -11.43% (2025-12-12) vs AMD -17.31% (2026-02-04). Best day: AVGO +18.66% (2025-04-09) vs AMD +23.82% (2025-04-09).
Risk ratios: Sortino - AVGO: 1.55 vs. AMD: 1.97 , Calmar - AVGO: 1.44 vs. AMD: 2.60 , Sterling - AVGO: 2.24 vs. AMD: 3.39 , Treynor - AVGO: 0.28 vs. AMD: 0.36 , Ulcer Index - AVGO: 12.43% vs. AMD: 12.42%

Broadcom vs AMD Correlation

0.43 Average Correlation

Broadcom and AMD are moderately correlated over the past year. With a correlation of 0.43, these assets show moderate co-movement, offering some diversification when held together.

For portfolio construction, this moderate correlation offers some diversification benefit, though the assets still tend to move together during major market moves.

Metric	Value
Current (30-day)	0.41
Average (full period)	0.43
Minimum	-0.11
Maximum	0.91

Correlation measures how closely two assets move together. Values near +1 indicate strong co-movement, near 0 indicates independence, and negative values indicate inverse movement.

Investment Comparison

If you invested $10,000 in each asset on February 18, 2025:

AVGO $15,032.99 +50.3%

AMD $18,688.31 +86.9%

Difference: $3,655.32 (AMD ahead)

Broadcom and AMD: Risk Analysis

Broadcom experienced its maximum drawdown of -35.8% from 2025-02-19 to 2025-04-04. It took 39 days to recover.

AMD experienced its maximum drawdown of -31.9% from 2025-03-25 to 2025-04-08. It took 36 days to recover.

Smaller drawdowns and faster recoveries indicate lower downside risk and greater resilience during market stress.

Sharpe Ratio of AVGO and AMD

AVGO Sharpe Ratio

↑ 0.99

AMD Sharpe Ratio

↑ 1.19

Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility). A higher Sharpe indicates better risk-adjusted performance. AMD had a higher Sharpe (1.19 vs 0.99), indicating better risk-adjusted performance.

A Sharpe above 1.0 is generally considered good, above 2.0 is excellent. Negative Sharpe means the asset underperformed the risk-free rate. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Sortino Ratio of AVGO and AMD

AVGO Sortino Ratio

↑ 1.55

AMD Sortino Ratio

↑ 1.97

Sortino ratio measures return per unit of downside risk. Unlike Sharpe, it only counts downside deviation (returns below the target return). AMD had better downside-adjusted returns.

A higher Sortino is better. It's useful when upside volatility is common (crypto is the obvious example). Downside deviation: AVGO 32.6% vs AMD 38.5%. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices, using the daily risk-free rate as the target return, and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Calmar Ratio of AVGO and AMD

AVGO Calmar Ratio

↑ 1.44

AMD Calmar Ratio

↑ 2.60

Calmar ratio compares CAGR to maximum drawdown. Higher Calmar means more return per unit of worst drawdown. AMD posted the higher Calmar ratio.

Calmar is computed on each asset's full 365-day lookback and uses the max drawdown over that same window.

Sterling Ratio of AVGO and AMD

AVGO Sterling Ratio

↑ 2.24

AMD Sterling Ratio

↑ 3.39

Sterling ratio measures excess return per unit of average drawdown (typically drawdowns worse than 10%). AMD posted the higher Sterling ratio.

Sterling uses average drawdown events deeper than 10% and subtracts the risk-free rate to report excess return.

Treynor Ratio of AVGO and AMD

AVGO Treynor Ratio

↑ 0.28

AMD Treynor Ratio

↑ 0.36

Treynor ratio measures excess return per unit of market risk (beta) instead of total volatility. AMD posted the higher Treynor ratio.

Treynor uses beta vs the S&P 500 (SPY) on shared dates and the average 3-month Treasury rate as the risk-free rate.

Ulcer Index of AVGO and AMD

AVGO Ulcer Index

12.43%

AMD Ulcer Index

12.42%

Ulcer Index captures drawdown depth and duration. Lower Ulcer Index means less drawdown pain. AMD had the lower Ulcer Index (less drawdown pain).

Ulcer Index is computed from each asset's drawdown series over the full lookback window.

Tail Risk & Distribution Shape (1-Year): Broadcom vs. AMD

This section looks at the shape of daily returns, not just the average. Tail stats are computed per asset on its own daily series (crypto includes weekends). We use daily log returns $\ln\left(\frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}}\right)$ so multi-day moves add cleanly.

Definitions: Value at Risk (VaR), Expected Shortfall, skew, kurtosis, and fat tails.

Metric (1-Year)	AVGO	AMD
5% VaR (daily log return)	-5.03%	-5.60%
5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR)	-6.84% (worst 13 days)	-8.43% (worst 13 days)
Skew	0.43	0.70
Excess kurtosis	4.61	7.67
2σ tail days (down / up)	6 / 7	6 / 6
Worst day	-11.43% (2025-12-12)	-17.31% (2026-02-04)
Best day	+18.66% (2025-04-09)	+23.82% (2025-04-09)

Downside co-moves (2σ) — 1-Year

Computed on shared dates only (n=246). A “2σ downside move” means a shared-close log return more than 2 standard deviations below that asset’s own mean on this shared-date series. Dates below show simple returns (%) for readability.

When AMD has a big down day, AVGO also does

33.3%

2 / 6 days

When AVGO has a big down day, AMD also does

33.3%

2 / 6 days

Show downside tail dates

Dates below are shared-date observations. The “Date” is the period end (close). Tail thresholds are computed on log returns, but the table shows simple returns (%) for readability. Returns are computed from the previous shared close to this one (for example, Friday → Monday includes weekend moves).

Days when both AVGO and AMD had a big down day (2σ)

Date (interval)	AVGO	AMD
2025-04-03	-10.51%	-8.90%
2025-04-10	-6.94%	-8.41%

Days when AVGO had a big down day

Date (interval)	AVGO	AMD
2025-02-27	-7.11%	-4.99%
2025-02-28 → 2025-03-03	-6.05%	-1.63%
2025-03-06	-6.33%	-2.77%
2025-04-03	-10.51%	-8.90%
2025-04-10	-6.94%	-8.41%
2025-12-12	-11.43%	-4.81%

Days when AMD had a big down day

Date (interval)	AVGO	AMD
2025-04-03	-10.51%	-8.90%
2025-04-04	-5.01%	-8.57%
2025-04-10	-6.94%	-8.41%
2025-10-10	-5.91%	-7.72%
2025-11-20	-2.14%	-7.84%
2026-02-04	-3.83%	-17.31%

Read this as “how ugly the ugly days get”, not as a precise forecast. One-year samples are small, so tail estimates are inherently noisy.

Broadcom vs AMD Volatility (AVGO vs AMD)

AVGO Volatility

51.1%

±3.22% daily

AMD Volatility

64.0%

±4.03% daily

Typical daily swing

AVGO

±3.22%

AMD

±4.03%

Broadcom's annualized volatility of 51.1% means it typically moves ±3.22% on any given day.

AMD's annualized volatility of 64.0% means it typically moves ±4.03% on any given day.

AMD's higher volatility means a wider path to returns — this can be attractive for tactical, shorter-term exposure, while AVGO's smoother profile may better suit long-term allocators seeking steadier growth.

For comparison, the S&P 500 typically has 15-18% annualized volatility, translating to roughly ±1% daily moves. Higher volatility means larger potential gains but also larger potential losses.

Broadcom vs AMD Performance Over Time

Metric	AVGO	AMD
30 Days	-1.3%	5.1%
90 Days	-4%	-17.5%
180 Days	9.8%	18%
1 Year	N/A	N/A

Shorter time frames can show different leaders as market conditions change. Consider your investment horizon when comparing performance.

Full Comparison of Broadcom vs. AMD (1-Year)

Metric	AVGO	AMD
Total Return	+50.3%	+86.9%
Annualized Volatility	51.1%	64.0%
Sharpe Ratio	0.99	1.19
Sortino Ratio	1.55	1.97
Calmar Ratio	1.44	2.60
Sterling Ratio	2.24	3.39
Treynor Ratio	0.28	0.36
Ulcer Index	12.43%	12.42%
Max Drawdown	-35.8%	-31.9%
Avg Correlation to S&P 500	0.58	0.53
5% VaR (daily log return)	-5.03%	-5.60%
5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR)	-6.84%	-8.43%
Skew	0.43	0.70
Excess kurtosis	4.61	7.67
2σ tail days (down / up)	6 / 7	6 / 6

Audit this calculation

Formulas, inputs, and conventions used to compute the metrics on this page.

Inputs & conventions

Shared window for pair metrics: 2025-02-18 → 2026-02-10 (last shared close).
Rolling correlation sample (shared closes): 217 rolling 30-day values (from 246 shared daily returns).
Annualization (days/year): AVGO: 252 days/year; AMD: 252 days/year.
Risk-free rate: Uses the 3-month U.S. Treasury yield (FRED: DGS3MO), averaged over each asset’s window:

AVGO: 4.20% over 2025-02-18 → 2026-02-10.

AMD: 4.20% over 2025-02-18 → 2026-02-13.
Volatility drag (rule of thumb): Estimated from annualized volatility (simple returns). For the log-return framing, see Log returns.

AVGO: ≈ -13.1%/yr

AMD: ≈ -20.5%/yr
Data alignment: No forward fill. Correlation and tail co-moves are computed on shared closes only.
For cross-calendar pairs (e.g., crypto vs stocks), weekend/holiday moves roll into the next shared close.
Return conventions: Volatility/Sharpe/Sortino use simple daily returns. Tail-risk uses daily log returns for distribution stats (but tables show simple returns). Log returns.

Formulas

Daily simple return

r_t = \frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}} - 1

Volatility

\sigma_{ann} = \sigma(r_t)\sqrt{A}

Volatility drag (approx.)

\text{drag} \approx \tfrac{1}{2}\sigma_{ann}^2

Sharpe Ratio

S = \frac{A\,\bar{r} - r_f}{\sigma(r_t)\sqrt{A}}

Sortino Ratio

So = \frac{A\,\bar{r} - r_f}{\sqrt{\mathbb{E}[\min(0,\,r_t - r_f/A)^2]}\,\sqrt{A}}

Maximum Drawdown

MDD = \min_t\left(\frac{P_t}{\max_{s \le t} P_s} - 1\right)

Average Correlation

\rho = \frac{\operatorname{cov}(r^A,\,r^B)}{\sigma_A\,\sigma_B}

Log returns

\ell_t = \ln\left(\frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}}\right)

Notation

$P_t$: Price on day t.
$r_t$: Simple daily return.
$\ell_t$: Log daily return.
$\bar{r}$: Average daily return.
$\sigma(r_t)$: Standard deviation of daily returns.
$A$: Annualization factor (days/year).
$r_f$: Annual risk-free rate.

Broadcom vs AMD: Frequently Asked Questions

Which has higher volatility: AVGO or AMD?

AMD showed higher volatility at 64.0% annualized, compared to 51.1% for AVGO Over the past year. Higher volatility means larger price swings in both directions.

Does AVGO provide diversification when held with AMD?

AVGO and AMD are moderately correlated over the past year, with an average correlation of 0.43. This offers some diversification benefit, though they still tend to move together during major market moves.

How bad are the worst 5% days for AVGO vs AMD?

Over the past year, AVGO's 5% VaR was -5.03% and its 5% Expected Shortfall was -6.84% (worst 13 days). AMD's were -5.60% and -8.43% (worst 13 days).

Do AVGO and AMD crash together on bad days?

On shared dates (n=246), when AMD has a 2σ down day, AVGO also does 33.3% (2/6 days). In the other direction, when AVGO has one, AMD also does 33.3% (2/6 days).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns: AVGO or AMD?

AMD showed better risk-adjusted performance with a Sharpe ratio of 1.19 versus AVGO's 0.99 Over the past year.

Can AVGO and AMD be combined in a portfolio?

Yes, though allocation sizing matters. Their moderate correlation offers some diversification benefits. AMD's higher volatility (64.0%) means even small allocations can materially impact overall portfolio risk.