Impact-Site-Verification: 0eedbe8d-4e05-4893-8456-85377301e322

Ethereum vs Apple (ETH vs AAPL): Returns, Risk & Volatility (2026)

Last updated: January 10, 2026

Gale Finance Team
Written by Gale Finance Team
Sid Kalla
Reviewed by Sid Kalla CFA Charterholder

Two industry titans - one for the digital assets, and one for tech.

TL;DR: Over the past year, ETH returned -5.6% while AAPL returned +11.1%. AAPL showed better risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe: 0.36). AAPL was less volatile (32.4% vs 74.9%).

Analysis period: 2025-01-13 to 2026-01-10

ETH Total Return
-5.6%
AAPL Total Return
+11.1%

Relative Performance of ETH vs AAPL (Normalized to 100)

ETH AAPL

Normalized to 100 at start date for comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Total Return: ETH delivered a -5.6% total return, while AAPL returned +11.1% over the same period. AAPL outperformed on total returns.
  • Risk-Adjusted Return (Sharpe Ratio): AAPL had a higher Sharpe (0.36 vs 0.23), indicating better risk-adjusted performance.
  • Volatility (Annualized): ETH was more volatile, with 74.9% annualized volatility, versus 32.4% for AAPL.
  • Maximum Drawdown: AAPL's maximum drawdown was -30.2%, while ETH experienced a deeper drawdown of -57.7%.
  • Tail Risk (VaR & Expected Shortfall): At the 5% level (daily log returns), ETH's VaR was -5.85% and its Expected Shortfall (CVaR) was -8.76%; AAPL's were -3.28% and -4.69%. VaR is the cutoff; Expected Shortfall is the average move on the worst days.
  • Skew & Kurtosis: Skew: ETH 0.22 vs AAPL 0.72. Excess kurtosis: ETH 3.37 vs AAPL 11.84. Negative skew leans downside; higher excess kurtosis means fatter tails.
  • Tail Days & Extremes: 2σ tail days (down/up): ETH 10/9, AAPL 6/5. Worst day: ETH -15.86% (2025-03-04) vs AAPL -9.70% (2025-04-03). Best day: ETH +19.38% (2025-05-09) vs AAPL +14.26% (2025-04-09).

Ethereum vs Apple Correlation

0.32 Average Correlation

Ethereum and Apple are moderately correlated over the past year. With a correlation of 0.32, these assets show moderate co-movement, offering some diversification when held together.

For portfolio construction, this moderate correlation offers some diversification benefit, though the assets still tend to move together during major market moves.

Metric Metric Value
Current (30-day) 0.08
Average (full period) 0.32
Minimum -0.22
Maximum 0.61

Correlation measures how closely two assets move together. Values near +1 indicate strong co-movement, near 0 indicates independence, and negative values indicate inverse movement.

Investment Comparison

If you invested $10,000 in each asset on January 13, 2025:

ETH $9,441.13 -5.6%
AAPL $11,114.5 +11.1%

Difference: $1,673.37 (AAPL ahead)

Trade ETH or AAPL

Access these assets on trusted platforms.

Affiliate disclosure

Ethereum and Apple: Risk Analysis

Ethereum experienced its maximum drawdown of -57.7% from 2025-01-18 to 2025-04-09. It took 100 days to recover.

Apple experienced its maximum drawdown of -30.2% from 2025-02-24 to 2025-04-08. It took 167 days to recover.

Smaller drawdowns and faster recoveries indicate lower downside risk and greater resilience during market stress.

Sharpe Ratio of ETH and AAPL

ETH Sharpe Ratio
0.23
AAPL Sharpe Ratio
0.36

Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility). A higher Sharpe indicates better risk-adjusted performance. AAPL had a higher Sharpe (0.36 vs 0.23), indicating better risk-adjusted performance.

A Sharpe above 1.0 is generally considered good, above 2.0 is excellent. Negative Sharpe means the asset underperformed the risk-free rate. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Sortino Ratio of ETH and AAPL

ETH Sortino Ratio
0.36
AAPL Sortino Ratio
0.49

Sortino ratio measures return per unit of downside risk. Unlike Sharpe, it only penalizes negative volatility. AAPL had better downside-adjusted returns.

A higher Sortino is better. It's particularly useful for assets with asymmetric volatility (big gains, smaller losses). Downside volatility: ETH 48.7% vs AAPL 23.6%. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Tail Risk & Distribution Shape: Ethereum vs. Apple

This section looks at the shape of daily returns, not just the average. We use daily log returns ln(PtPt1)\ln\left(\frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}}\right) so multi-day moves add cleanly.

Metric (1y) ETH AAPL
5% VaR (daily log return) -5.85% -3.28%
5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR) -8.76% (worst 19 days) -4.69% (worst 13 days)
Skew 0.22 0.72
Excess kurtosis 3.37 11.84
2σ tail days (down / up) 10 / 9 6 / 5
Worst day -15.86% (2025-03-04) -9.70% (2025-04-03)
Best day +19.38% (2025-05-09) +14.26% (2025-04-09)

Downside co-moves (2σ)

Computed on shared dates only (n=249). A “2σ downside move” means a shared-close log return more than 2 standard deviations below that asset’s own mean on this shared-date series. Dates below show simple returns (%) for readability.

When AAPL has a big down day, ETH also does
16.7%
1 / 6 days
When ETH has a big down day, AAPL also does
20.0%
1 / 5 days
Show downside tail dates

Dates below are shared-date observations. The “Date” is the period end (close). Tail thresholds are computed on log returns, but the table shows simple returns (%) for readability. Returns are computed from the previous shared close to this one (for example, Friday → Monday includes weekend moves).

Days when both ETH and AAPL had a big down day (2σ)

Date (interval) ETH AAPL
2025-03-07 → 2025-03-10 -12.22% -4.85%

Days when ETH had a big down day

Date (interval) ETH AAPL
2025-01-31 → 2025-02-03 -12.70% -3.39%
2025-03-07 → 2025-03-10 -12.22% -4.85%
2025-04-04 → 2025-04-07 -14.25% -3.67%
2025-08-22 → 2025-08-25 -9.27% -0.26%
2025-10-10 -12.20% -3.45%

Days when AAPL had a big down day

Date (interval) ETH AAPL
2025-01-16 -3.99% -4.04%
2025-03-07 → 2025-03-10 -12.22% -4.85%
2025-04-03 +1.25% -9.25%
2025-04-04 -0.21% -7.29%
2025-04-08 -5.43% -4.98%
2025-04-10 -8.34% -4.24%

Read this as “how ugly the ugly days get”, not as a precise forecast. One-year samples are small, so tail estimates are inherently noisy.

Ethereum vs Apple Volatility (ETH vs AAPL)

ETH Volatility
74.9%
±3.92% daily
AAPL Volatility
32.4%
±2.04% daily
Typical daily swing
ETH
±3.92%
AAPL
±2.04%

Ethereum's annualized volatility of 74.9% means it typically moves ±3.92% on any given day.

Apple's annualized volatility of 32.4% means it typically moves ±2.04% on any given day.

ETH's higher volatility means a wider path to returns — this can be attractive for tactical, shorter-term exposure, while AAPL's smoother profile may better suit long-term allocators seeking steadier growth.

For comparison, the S&P 500 typically has 15-18% annualized volatility, translating to roughly ±1% daily moves. Higher volatility means larger potential gains but also larger potential losses.

Ethereum vs Apple Performance Over Time

Metric ETH AAPL
30 Days -7.2% -7%
90 Days -19.7% 5.9%
180 Days 4.7% 23.1%
1 Year -5.7% 11.1%

Shorter time frames can show different leaders as market conditions change. Consider your investment horizon when comparing performance.

Full Comparison of Ethereum vs. Apple (1-Year)

Metric ETH AAPL
Total Return -5.6% +11.1%
Annualized Volatility 74.9% 32.4%
Sharpe Ratio 0.23 0.36
Sortino Ratio 0.36 0.49
Max Drawdown -57.7% -30.2%
Avg Correlation to S&P 500 0.51 0.66
5% VaR (daily log return) -5.85% -3.28%
5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR) -8.76% -4.69%
Skew 0.22 0.72
Excess kurtosis 3.37 11.84
2σ tail days (down / up) 10 / 9 6 / 5

Ethereum vs Apple: Frequently Asked Questions

Which has higher volatility: ETH or AAPL?

ETH showed higher volatility at 74.9% annualized, compared to 32.4% for AAPL Over the past year. Higher volatility means larger price swings in both directions.

Does ETH provide diversification when held with AAPL?

ETH and AAPL are moderately correlated over the past year, with an average correlation of 0.32. This offers some diversification benefit, though they still tend to move together during major market moves.

How bad are the worst 5% days for ETH vs AAPL?

Over the past year, ETH's 5% VaR was -5.85% and its 5% Expected Shortfall was -8.76% (worst 19 days). AAPL's were -3.28% and -4.69% (worst 13 days).

Do ETH and AAPL crash together on bad days?

On shared dates (n=249), when AAPL has a 2σ down day, ETH also does 16.7% (1/6 days). In the other direction, when ETH has one, AAPL also does 20.0% (1/5 days).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns: ETH or AAPL?

AAPL showed better risk-adjusted performance with a Sharpe ratio of 0.36 versus ETH's 0.23 Over the past year.

Can ETH and AAPL be combined in a portfolio?

Yes, though allocation sizing matters. Their moderate correlation offers some diversification benefits. ETH's higher volatility (74.9%) means even small allocations can materially impact overall portfolio risk.