Analysis period: 2025-01-01 to 2025-12-31
Relative Performance of NVDA vs GOOG (Normalized to 100)
Normalized to 100 at start date for comparison
Key Takeaways
- Total Return: NVDA delivered a +34.9% total return, while GOOG returned +65.3% over the same period. GOOG outperformed on total returns.
- Risk-Adjusted Return (Sharpe Ratio): GOOG had a higher Sharpe (1.62 vs 0.77), indicating better risk-adjusted performance.
- Volatility (Annualized): NVDA was more volatile, with 49.6% annualized volatility, versus 32.0% for GOOG.
- Maximum Drawdown: GOOG's maximum drawdown was -29.3%, while NVDA experienced a deeper drawdown of -36.9%.
Nvidia vs Google Correlation
Nvidia and Google were moderately correlated in 2025. With a correlation of 0.39, these assets showed moderate co-movement, offering some diversification when held together.
For portfolio construction, this moderate correlation offers some diversification benefit, though the assets still tend to move together during major market moves.
| Metric | Metric | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Current (30-day) | 0.36 | |
| Average (full period) | 0.39 | |
| Minimum | -0.09 | |
| Maximum | 0.91 |
Correlation measures how closely two assets move together. Values near +1 indicate strong co-movement, near 0 indicates independence, and negative values indicate inverse movement.
Investment Comparison
If you invested $10,000 in each asset on January 1, 2025:
Difference: $3,038.33 (GOOG ahead)
Nvidia and Google: Risk Analysis
Nvidia experienced its maximum drawdown of -36.9% from 2025-01-06 to 2025-04-04. It has not yet recovered to its previous peak.
Google experienced its maximum drawdown of -29.3% from 2025-02-04 to 2025-04-08. It has not yet recovered to its previous peak.
Smaller drawdowns and faster recoveries indicate lower downside risk and greater resilience during market stress.
Sharpe Ratio of NVDA and GOOG
Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility). A higher Sharpe indicates better risk-adjusted performance. GOOG had a higher Sharpe (1.62 vs 0.77), indicating better risk-adjusted performance.
A Sharpe above 1.0 is generally considered good, above 2.0 is excellent. Negative Sharpe means the asset underperformed the risk-free rate. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).
Sortino Ratio of NVDA and GOOG
Sortino ratio measures return per unit of downside risk. Unlike Sharpe, it only penalizes negative volatility. GOOG had better downside-adjusted returns.
A higher Sortino is better. It's particularly useful for assets with asymmetric volatility (big gains, smaller losses). Downside volatility: NVDA 37.9% vs GOOG 20.8%. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).
Full Comparison of Nvidia vs. Google (2025)
| Metric | NVDA | GOOG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return | +34.9% | +65.3% |
| Annualized Volatility | 49.6% | 32.0% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.77 | 1.62 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.01 | 2.49 |
| Max Drawdown | -36.9% | -29.3% |
| Avg Correlation to S&P 500 | N/A | N/A |
Nvidia vs Google: Frequently Asked Questions
Which had higher volatility: NVDA or GOOG?
NVDA showed higher volatility at 49.6% annualized, compared to 32.0% for GOOG During 2025. Higher volatility meant larger price swings in both directions.
Did NVDA provide diversification when held with GOOG?
NVDA and GOOG were moderately correlated in 2025, with an average correlation of 0.39. This offered some diversification benefit, though they still tended to move together during major market moves.
Which had better risk-adjusted returns: NVDA or GOOG?
GOOG showed better risk-adjusted performance with a Sharpe ratio of 1.62 versus NVDA's 0.77 During 2025.
Could NVDA and GOOG have been combined in a portfolio?
Yes, though allocation sizing mattered. Their moderate correlation offered some diversification benefits. NVDA's higher volatility (49.6%) meant even small allocations can materially impact overall portfolio risk.