Impact-Site-Verification: 0eedbe8d-4e05-4893-8456-85377301e322

Stock · Trading days

Vertiv Holdings (VRT)

Vertiv Holdings's returns, drawdowns, and beta to S&P 500, in one view.

Gale Finance Team
Written by Gale Finance Team
Sid Kalla
Reviewed by Sid Kalla CFA Charterholder
Quick Answer

What is Vertiv Holdings' risk, return, and volatility like?

Vertiv Holdings returned +263.7% over the 1Y window. On the Since inception lens, Sharpe ratio is 1.58, annualized volatility is 65.0%, and max drawdown is -52.7%.

Total Return
1Y +263.7%
Since inception +192.3%
Sharpe Ratio
1Y 2.48
Since inception 1.58
Annualized Volatility
1Y 57.0%
Since inception 65.0%
Max Drawdown
1Y -24.8%
Since inception -52.7%

Trade VRT

Access this asset on trusted platforms.

Affiliate disclosure

Price history

Vertiv Holdings price since inception

Track Vertiv Holdings's standalone price path with macro and asset-specific events enabled by default.

Vertiv Holdings price since inception

VRT
Latest close $367.13 Data through 2026-05-12
Since inception low $59.35 Window low
Since inception high $367.92 Window high

Key takeaways

  • Total Return: VRT returned +263.7% over the 1Y window and +192.3% over the Since inception window ; annualized return over Since inception was +136.1%.
  • Risk-adjusted return: Sharpe was 1.58 and Sortino was 2.48 over Since inception. Sharpe counts total volatility; Sortino focuses on downside volatility.
  • Volatility & drawdown: Annualized volatility was 57.0% over 1Y and 65.0% over Since inception ; max drawdown was -24.8% over 1Y and -52.7% over Since inception .
  • Tail risk (Expected Shortfall): Over Since inception, daily VaR (5%) was -6.7% and Expected Shortfall was -9.1%. VaR is the cutoff; Expected Shortfall is the average move inside the worst 5% of daily returns.
  • Skew & kurtosis: Over Since inception, skew was 0.15 and excess kurtosis was 3.13. Skew shows return asymmetry; excess kurtosis shows how fat the tails were versus a Normal distribution.
  • Risk ratios: Sortino Ratio: 2.48 , Calmar Ratio: 2.58 , Sterling Ratio: 4.84 , Treynor Ratio: 0.46 , Ulcer Index: 16.92% .

Vertiv Holdings Drawdown

VRT 1Y Max Drawdown
-24.8%
2025-10-29 to 2025-12-17
VRT Since inception Max Drawdown
-52.7%
2025-02-10 to 2025-04-04

Max drawdown shows the deepest peak-to-trough decline Vertiv Holdings suffered in each research window. 1Y: -24.8%; Since inception: -52.7%.

Vertiv Holdings is currently -0.2% below its prior peak, with the high-water mark at $367.92. Since inception low is $59.35.

VRT underwater plot (Since inception). Zero means at a prior peak; dips show how far below peak the close was on each day. Deepest trough: -52.7% on Apr 4, 2025.
-52.7% 2025-02-10 2026-05-12 0% -53%

Since inception drawdown episodes

#1
-52.7% Feb 10, 2025 to Apr 4, 2025
Recovered Jun 27, 2025 137 total days
#2
-24.8% Oct 29, 2025 to Dec 17, 2025
Recovered Feb 9, 2026 103 total days
#3
-16.3% Jul 31, 2025 to Sep 8, 2025
Recovered Sep 22, 2025 53 total days

Vertiv Holdings Volatility

VRT 1Y Volatility
57.0%
Annualized daily closes
VRT Since inception Volatility
65.0%
Annualized daily closes

Volatility Vertiv Holdings's annualized volatility shows how widely daily closes moved over 1Y and Since inception. Higher values mean a noisier path, not automatically a better or worse investment. 1Y: 57.0%; Since inception: 65.0%.

Benchmark context

Where VRT fits relative to other lenses

Benchmark links are secondary on this page. Use them when you want to place the asset against a specific market, factor, or historical counterpart.

Default benchmark

S&P 500

SPY

Broad equity benchmark

1Y return
+26.9%
VRT minus SPY
+221.2%
Correlation
0.52
1Y
VRT vs SPY average correlation
Moderately linked
0.52
QQQ

Nasdaq 100

Corr 0.58

Growth and tech benchmark

1Y return +37.7%
VRT minus QQQ +210.4%
BTC

Bitcoin

Corr 0.20

Cross-asset crypto benchmark

1Y return -22.0%
VRT minus BTC +270.1%
XAU

Gold

Corr 0.14

Store-of-value benchmark

1Y return +45.1%
VRT minus XAU +203.0%

Risk-adjusted ratios

These ratios compare return against different definitions of risk: total volatility, downside volatility, drawdowns, benchmark beta, and time spent underwater.

Vertiv Holdings Sharpe Ratio

VRT 1Y Sharpe ratio
2.48
Recent window
VRT Since inception Sharpe ratio
1.58
Deeper research window

VRT Sharpe Ratio (Since inception)

Return per total volatility

The dot sits at (Vertiv Holdings's annualized volatility, its excess annualized return). The slope from the origin to the dot is the Sharpe ratio — steeper means the asset converted risk into return more efficiently.

Higher is better
Excess return Annualized volatility 0 75% vol 65.0% · excess +102.8%
excess annualized return / total volatility
Formula Sharpe=E[R]RfσR\displaystyle \mathrm{Sharpe} = \frac{\mathbb{E}[R] - R_f}{\sigma_R}

Sharpe ratio Vertiv Holdings's Sharpe ratio measures excess return per unit of total volatility. Higher readings mean the asset converted risk into return more efficiently over the same window. 1Y: 2.48; Since inception: 1.58.

A Sharpe above 1.0 is generally considered good, above 2.0 is excellent. Negative Sharpe means the asset underperformed the risk-free rate. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Vertiv Holdings Sortino Ratio

VRT 1Y Sortino ratio
4.40
Recent window
VRT Since inception Sortino ratio
2.48
Deeper research window

VRT Sortino Ratio (Since inception)

Return per downside volatility

Vertiv Holdings's daily-return distribution over the long window. Days left of the target line are the only ones Sortino penalizes in the denominator — so a distribution with a fat left tail produces a smaller Sortino even at the same mean return.

Higher is better
Frequency (days) Daily return (%) target -14.0% +26.0% 50 0
excess annualized return / downside volatility
Formula Sortino=E[R]Rfσdown\displaystyle \mathrm{Sortino} = \frac{\mathbb{E}[R] - R_f}{\sigma_{\mathrm{down}}}

Sortino ratio Vertiv Holdings's Sortino ratio isolates downside volatility instead of all volatility. It is the cleaner lens when you care more about bad downside moves than upside noise. 1Y: 4.40; Since inception: 2.48.

A higher Sortino is better. It's useful when upside volatility is common (crypto is the obvious example). Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices, using the daily risk-free rate as the target return, and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Vertiv Holdings Calmar Ratio

VRT 1Y Calmar ratio
10.65
Recent window
VRT Since inception Calmar ratio
2.58
Deeper research window

VRT Calmar Ratio (Since inception)

CAGR per worst drawdown

Vertiv Holdings's CAGR bar sits above zero, the max drawdown bar sits below. Calmar is the ratio of those two magnitudes — a shallow drawdown bar with a tall CAGR bar produces a strong Calmar.

Higher is better
0% VRT Since inception +136.1% -52.7%
CAGR / max drawdown
Formula Calmar=CAGRMaxDD\displaystyle \mathrm{Calmar} = \frac{\mathrm{CAGR}}{|\mathrm{MaxDD}|}

Calmar ratio Vertiv Holdings's Calmar ratio measures return per unit of max drawdown. It is useful when the path of losses matters as much as the final return. 1Y: 10.65; Since inception: 2.58.

Calmar is computed on each asset's full 365-day lookback and uses the max drawdown over that same window.

Vertiv Holdings Sterling Ratio

VRT 1Y Sterling ratio
13.84
Recent window
VRT Since inception Sterling ratio
4.84
Deeper research window

VRT Sterling Ratio (Since inception)

Return per average drawdown

The underwater curve shows Vertiv Holdings's drawdowns over the long window. Sterling averages every event deeper than the 10% threshold instead of taking only the worst one — so an asset with many mid-size drawdowns scores worse here than on Calmar.

Higher is better
0% -14% -28% -42% -55% 10% drawdown threshold
excess CAGR / average deep drawdown
Formula Sterling=CAGRRfD>10%\displaystyle \mathrm{Sterling} = \frac{\mathrm{CAGR} - R_f}{\overline{D}_{>10\%}}

Sterling ratio Vertiv Holdings's Sterling ratio compares return against deep drawdown pressure. It gives a harsher read on assets that compound well but suffer ugly declines along the way. 1Y: 13.84; Since inception: 4.84.

Sterling uses average drawdown events deeper than 10% and subtracts the risk-free rate to report excess return.

Vertiv Holdings Ulcer Index

VRT 1Y Ulcer Index
8.14
Recent window
VRT Since inception Ulcer Index
16.92
Deeper research window

VRT Ulcer Index (Since inception)

Drawdown pain

The underwater curve shows how deep and how long Vertiv Holdings's drawdowns were. Ulcer is the root-mean-square of that curve — both depth and persistence count, so lower is better.

Lower is better
0% -14% -28% -42% -55%
root-mean-square drawdown
Formula UI=E[Dt2]\displaystyle \mathrm{UI} = \sqrt{\mathbb{E}[D_t^2]}

Ulcer Index Vertiv Holdings's Ulcer Index measures both the depth and persistence of drawdowns. Lower is better because it means fewer and shallower underwater periods. 1Y: 8.14; Since inception: 16.92.

Ulcer Index is computed from each asset's drawdown series over the full lookback window.

Vertiv Holdings Treynor Ratio

VRT 1Y Treynor
0.58
Beta 2.46 vs SPY
VRT Since inception Treynor
0.46
Beta 2.22 vs SPY

VRT Treynor Ratio (Since inception)

Excess return per beta vs SPY

The line's slope is Vertiv Holdings's beta to SPY — steeper means more market-sensitive. Treynor divides excess return by that slope, so an asset can look efficient with a shallow beta and a small return, or inefficient with a steep beta and a big return.

Higher is better
Asset return Market return 0 0 β 2.22
excess return / market beta
Formula Treynor=E[R]Rfβ\displaystyle \mathrm{Treynor} = \frac{\mathbb{E}[R] - R_f}{\beta}

Treynor ratio measures excess return per unit of market beta versus SPY. A high Treynor means the asset compensated its market exposure well over this window. A low or negative Treynor means the asset's market risk wasn't rewarded.

Treynor uses beta vs the S&P 500 (SPY) on shared dates and the average 3-month Treasury rate as the risk-free rate.

Vertiv Holdings Tail Risk

Tail-risk stats use daily return distributions rather than simple end-point returns. They show how ugly the left tail has been, how severe the worst 5% of days were, and whether returns were skewed toward outsized upside or downside shocks.

The histogram shows the shape of Vertiv Holdings's daily log returns over the Since inception window. Bars left of the 5% VaR marker are the worst 5% of days; the ES marker is the average loss inside that tail. Skew and excess kurtosis describe whether the distribution is symmetric around zero and whether extreme days are more common than a Normal distribution predicts.

VRT daily return distribution (Since inception)

VRT daily return distribution (Since inception)

Log-return histogram with Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall markers at the 5% left tail.

Days
VRT Since inception VaR 5% ES 5% -25.2% 0% +25.2% Daily log return
worst-5% daily return and the average loss inside it
Formula VaR5%=Q0.05(R),ES5%=E[RRVaR5%]\displaystyle \mathrm{VaR}_{5\%} = Q_{0.05}(R),\quad \mathrm{ES}_{5\%} = \mathbb{E}[R \mid R \le \mathrm{VaR}_{5\%}]
Metric 1YSince inception
VaR (5%) -5.3% Historical daily threshold -6.7% Historical daily threshold
Expected shortfall (5%) -6.7% Beyond the VaR threshold -9.1% Beyond the VaR threshold
Skew 0.78 0.15
Excess kurtosis 5.04 3.13

Less negative daily VaR and Expected Shortfall values mean the left tail was less violent. Skew and excess kurtosis help distinguish between steady compounding and a path dominated by occasional extreme moves.

Full stats table

Every window-consistent research metric

Each column keeps the same horizon across returns, ratios, drawdowns, and tail-risk metrics.

Metric
1Y Recent window
Since inception Deeper research window
Total return
+263.7%
+192.3%
Annualized return
+264.0%
+136.1%
Volatility
57.0% Annualized daily closes
65.0% Annualized daily closes
Sharpe ratio
2.48
1.58
Sortino ratio
4.40
2.48
Calmar ratio
10.65
2.58
Sterling ratio
13.84
4.84
Ulcer Index
8.14
16.92
Max drawdown
-24.8% 2025-10-29 to 2025-12-17
-52.7% 2025-02-10 to 2025-04-04
VaR (5%)
-5.3% Historical daily threshold
-6.7% Historical daily threshold
Expected shortfall (5%)
-6.7% Beyond the VaR threshold
-9.1% Beyond the VaR threshold
Skew
0.78
0.15
Excess kurtosis
5.04
3.13

What viewers usually ask next

What is Vertiv Holdings's Since inception CAGR?

Vertiv Holdings's since inception cagr is +136.1% on Gale using the since-inception window.

What is Vertiv Holdings's 1-year volatility?

Annualized volatility is 57.0% over the past year.

What is Vertiv Holdings's since-inception Sharpe ratio?

Vertiv Holdings's Sharpe ratio is 1.58 using the since-inception window.

What is Vertiv Holdings's since-inception Sortino ratio?

Vertiv Holdings's Sortino ratio is 2.48 using the since-inception window.

What is Vertiv Holdings's since-inception Calmar ratio?

Vertiv Holdings's Calmar ratio is 2.58 using the since-inception window.

What is Vertiv Holdings's since-inception Sterling ratio?

Vertiv Holdings's Sterling ratio is 4.84 using the since-inception window.

What is Vertiv Holdings's since-inception Ulcer Index?

Vertiv Holdings's Ulcer Index is 16.92 using the since-inception window. Lower is better because it means shallower and less persistent drawdowns.

What is Vertiv Holdings's since-inception max drawdown?

Max drawdown is -52.7% over the since-inception window from 2025-02-10 to 2025-04-04.

What is Vertiv Holdings's since-inception daily Value at Risk?

Using historical daily returns, Gale estimates a 5% Value at Risk of -6.69% over the since-inception window.

What is Vertiv Holdings's since-inception Expected Shortfall?

Expected Shortfall is -9.05% over the since-inception window, which captures the average outcome inside the worst 5% of daily returns.

Is Vertiv Holdings still below its all-time high?

Current drawdown is -0.2% versus the all-time high of $367.92 reached on 2026-05-11.

Which benchmark should viewers open first for Vertiv Holdings?

S&P 500 is the default benchmark lens on Gale because it gives the cleanest context for Vertiv Holdings's recent behavior.